Great Teams Commit to the Boring Stuff


Hi Reader,

There’s a moment in an episode of Bluey called The Pool where Bluey’s dad forgets to bring all the “boring” pool gear—sunscreen, towels, goggles, floaties, snacks. The things that feel unnecessary in the moment as the kids just want to get to the pool as fast as possible.

At first, the kids are thrilled. Dad seems more fun and isn’t worrying about a checklist of things they need to complete.

But pretty quickly, the experience starts falling apart. The concrete is too hot. The sun is too intense. The games don’t work. The fun starts disappearing because all the things that made the experience enjoyable were missing.

Eventually, Bluey’s mum arrives carrying all the things they originally rolled their eyes at. And after the day turns around, she delivers the line:

“So, boring things are important sometimes then?”

It’s a funny parenting moment. But honestly, it also feels like one of the best explanations for why so many teams struggle to improve.

Too many leadership teams are looking for breakthrough moments while overlooking the foundational practices that actually make high performance possible. The boring stuff.

The stuff that doesn’t feel exciting in the moment, but shapes how the team operates over time. And in our experience, team transformation happens far less in the big moments, and far more in those repeated practices that teams commit to running together over and over again.

video preview

What the “Boring Stuff” Really Is

The boring stuff isn’t actually boring. It’s just not new, shiny, or attention-grabbing. It often looks like this:

  • Running a check-in at the beginning of your weekly team meeting to help build connection. Do this 52 weeks in a row, and your team will know each other far more deeply—and it only takes five minutes a week.
  • Spending five minutes reviewing the strategic priorities you each own, and then aligning on the most important ones together. Do this for 13 weeks in a row, and your team’s focus on what matters most will improve significantly.
  • Reviewing and adjusting your Team Charter once a month. Invest 60 minutes in this consistently, and your team will gain much greater clarity on its purpose and the norms that guide how you work together.
  • Using a simple tool that everyone can access to track action items, with clear owners and due dates. When you consistently revisit those commitments as a team, dependability and accountability begin to grow.

Most teams already know these things matter. But knowing is not the same as doing, and doing once is not the same as doing consistently. The difference is not in the idea. It’s in the commitment to the practice.


Why Teams Struggle to Commit to It

If the path to stronger team performance is this clear, why don’t more teams follow it? Part of the challenge is that the work doesn’t match our expectations of what meaningful change should feel like.

  1. It doesn’t feel exciting enough. Instead of a single breakthrough, you’re much more likely to experience a series of small ones. Progress shows up gradually, which makes it easy to overlook or undervalue.
  2. It requires patience and discipline. Real change happens through repetition, and most teams don’t give practices enough time to take hold before moving on to something new. Just as a habit begins to form, attention shifts.
  3. Lack of belief that small repetition will truly build to something significant. We underestimate the impact that consistently executing a few simple practices can have. We assume that meaningful change requires something bigger, more innovative, or more complex. So we keep searching for the next idea instead of committing to the ones we have already agreed to start.

Will power alone just won’t cut it. We think it's an issue of effort, and we just need to assert our collective will more. But the reality is that it requires systems that increase the odds of the new behavior turning into team habits.

Over time, this creates a pattern. Teams generate insight, experiment briefly, and then move on before the real benefits have time to emerge. The challenge isn’t that teams don’t have good ideas. It’s that they don’t stay with them long enough for those ideas to actually work.


What Great Teams Do Differently

Great teams take a different approach. They don’t expect to transform their performance in a quarter. They understand that transformation takes time, but trajectory can shift relatively quickly when they collectively commit to a few key changes.

They define those practices clearly, build them into how they operate, and run them consistently. But they don’t treat them as fixed changes. They treat them as evolving.

They commit to running a small set of practices over a defined period of time, and then they step back to reflect on what’s working and what’s not. Together, they make adjustments. Sometimes small ones. Sometimes more meaningful shifts. But over time, those micro adjustments begin to add up.

That’s the difference.

It’s not just consistency. It’s consistency paired with a shared mindset of improvement.

Over time, teams begin to look forward to these moments of reflection. There’s a sense of anticipation because they believe what they’ve learned will help them refine how they operate and make their practices even more effective.

This is where the compounding effect begins. Meetings become more effective, decisions get clearer, accountability becomes more normative, not because the team had a single breakthrough, but because they stayed committed to simple practices and kept improving them.

If you’re looking to strengthen your team, a simple place to start is this: What are the two or three practices you already know would make the biggest difference if you just did them consistently? And what would change if you committed to running them for the next 90 days, and refining them along the way?


A Final Thought

Great teams aren’t built on breakthrough moments alone - those can provide initial movement, but real change is built on repeated behaviors. The work that leads to noticeable improved performance is rarely exciting.

Start by choosing one or two practices you already know would make a difference, and commit to running them consistently. Give them time. Pay attention to what you learn. Adjust as you go.

Then stay with it long enough to see what happens. Because in the end, it’s not the idea that changes the team. It’s the team’s commitment to the practice.

-Shaun & Joe


Enjoying this newsletter?
You’ll love the conversations happening on our Leading Together Podcast and YouTube channel, where we dive deeper into how you can build a high performing leadership team


Get the 6 Levers Book

In today's fast-paced business environment, creating a healthy and high-performing organization is more challenging than ever. That's where At the Heart of Work comes in - a practical guide that introduces the 6 Levers Framework, designed to help leaders like you align people and systems effectively.

Whether you're leading a small team or an entire organization, the insights from this book will equip you to build a resilient, purpose-driven workplace where teams thrive.


Upcoming Events & Opportunities:

1123 Locust St. , St. Louis, MO 63101
Unsubscribe · Preferences

Leading Together

Leading Together is for senior leadership teams who want to become more cohesive and high performing. In each newsletter, 6 Levers co-founders Shaun Lee and Joe Olwig break down real-world case studies and share insights from their work with executive teams across industries. You’ll hear the patterns behind what makes leadership teams thrive - and what holds them back. Most importantly, every newsletter shares practical applications you can apply with your team.

Read more from Leading Together

Hi Reader, At this point, the data is hard to ignore. Research from organizations like the Center for Creative Leadership and Harvard Business Review continues to point to the same conclusion: organizations with high-performing executive teams significantly outperform those without them. They see stronger execution, healthier cultures, and better long-term results. And yet, only a small percentage of executive teams are actually operating at that level. One reason is surprisingly simple: many...

Hi Reader, The success of the Artemis II mission is remarkable. It reflects years of innovation, coordination, and progress toward something that once again feels just beyond our reach. But what stood out most wasn’t just what they accomplished. It was how they prepared. This wasn’t just a group of capable individuals. It was a team that had been preparing to operate together long before launch. Too often, we focus on individual development and growth, hoping it will translate into better...

Hi Reader, Each year, Gallup releases its State of the Global Workplace report, offering a clear look at how people are experiencing work. This year’s report surfaces a trend that should give leaders pause. Overall engagement hit its lowest point since 2020, but more concerning is where that decline is happening. Managers, the very group organizations rely on most to drive engagement, are experiencing the most significant decline. Gallup has led the way in helping organizations to understand...