Lessons from Artemis II - They Prepared as a Team


Hi Reader,

The success of the Artemis II mission is remarkable. It reflects years of innovation, coordination, and progress toward something that once again feels just beyond our reach.

But what stood out most wasn’t just what they accomplished. It was how they prepared. This wasn’t just a group of capable individuals. It was a team that had been preparing to operate together long before launch.

Too often, we focus on individual development and growth, hoping it will translate into better team performance. Then when it’s time to execute, we expect those individuals to come together and perform as a team, even though they have done little to anticipate and train for the challenges they will face.

Organizations like NASA have learned this over time. In the aftermath of the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster, it became clear that success depends not just on technical capability, but on how teams communicate, build trust, and operate under pressure. Those lessons were built into how teams prepare.

If teams want to reach new levels of performance, they have to prepare together. Shared understanding and shared experience are what make that possible. Here are three key ways the Artemis II team trained together.


Built Cohesion Through Shared Experience

The environment they were preparing for required complete reliance on one another. Confined spaces, high stakes, and constant interdependence meant that trust couldn’t be assumed. It had to be built.

They spent extended time working side by side, not just learning the mission, but learning each other. They worked through complex scenarios together, navigated uncertainty in real time, and developed a feel for how each person thinks, communicates, and responds.

That kind of familiarity doesn’t come from proximity alone. It comes from engaging in meaningful work together, especially the kind that requires coordination, decision-making, and clear communication. Over time, those shared experiences begin to shape trust. Teammates learn what to expect from one another, how to support each other, and how to stay aligned when the situation becomes more demanding.


Prepared for high stress situations

NASA’s preparation goes beyond the technical demands of the mission. They also prepare for how people will respond when the pressure is high.

Astronauts are trained to understand their tendencies in high-stress situations and how it affects their thinking, their communication, and how they show up with others. They don’t assume they will operate the same way under pressure as they do in normal conditions.

That awareness matters. When a team has prepared together in those conditions, individuals begin to recognize patterns in themselves and in each other. They know who tends to get quiet, who becomes more direct, who may need more clarity, and who might push for quick decisions. That familiarity helps teams stay focused on the work instead of misinterpreting behavior or taking things personally in the moment.

It also creates space for individual growth. Preparation makes it easier for each person to see where they need to improve. It surfaces the ways they might unintentionally slow down problem-solving or create friction under pressure. And it gives them the opportunity to commit to showing up differently when it matters most.


Established Communication Norms

Through simulations and rehearsals, the team developed clear agreements about how they would communicate when it mattered most. They aligned on communication standards and norms that shaped how information would flow, how decisions would be made, and how concerns would be raised and responded to.

These weren’t assumptions. They were explicit agreements that the team could rely on.

As they worked through different scenarios, those agreements were tested and refined. The team built familiarity with how to speak up, how to ask for clarity, and how to stay aligned as situations became more complex. They didn’t just learn what to say. They learned what was expected of each other in those moments.

That clarity reduces hesitation. It makes it easier to raise concerns and easier to stay coordinated when pressure increases. So when the stakes are high, the team doesn’t have to figure out how to communicate. They already know, because they’ve agreed on how they will.


A Final Thought

What stands out about Artemis is not just what they accomplished. It’s how they prepared to accomplish it. They didn’t assume they would come together when it mattered most. They invested the time to build that capability long before the mission began.

If we want our teams to perform at a higher level, we have to prepare together. Because in the end, teams don’t come together for the first time when it matters most. They perform at the level they’ve already practiced at.

-Shaun & Joe


Enjoying this newsletter?
You’ll love the conversations happening on our Leading Together Podcast and YouTube channel, where we dive deeper into how you can build a high performing leadership team


Get the 6 Levers Book

In today's fast-paced business environment, creating a healthy and high-performing organization is more challenging than ever. That's where At the Heart of Work comes in - a practical guide that introduces the 6 Levers Framework, designed to help leaders like you align people and systems effectively.

Whether you're leading a small team or an entire organization, the insights from this book will equip you to build a resilient, purpose-driven workplace where teams thrive.


Upcoming Events & Opportunities:

1123 Locust St. , St. Louis, MO 63101
Unsubscribe · Preferences

Leading Together

Leading Together is for senior leadership teams who want to become more cohesive and high performing. In each newsletter, 6 Levers co-founders Shaun Lee and Joe Olwig break down real-world case studies and share insights from their work with executive teams across industries. You’ll hear the patterns behind what makes leadership teams thrive - and what holds them back. Most importantly, every newsletter shares practical applications you can apply with your team.

Read more from Leading Together

Hi Reader, We often assume people aren't speaking up because they don't feel safe. We assume people are afraid of being judged, criticized, creating conflict, or damaging relationships – in other words, we assume that team psychological safety isn’t strong enough. And while that certainly happens, research suggests there may be another reason that is even more common. People stop speaking up when they no longer believe their input will lead to meaningful change. Think about what happens when...

Hi Reader, Many organizations desire to be more innovative. They wish they had more people bringing forward new ideas, solving problems creatively, and finding better ways to serve customers and clients and advance the mission and strategic goals It's usually not for a lack of good ideas. When teams struggle to bring new ideas to life, it's usually a conditions problem. It usually goes something like this: someone identifies an opportunity and brings forward a new idea. The team likes it, but...

Hi Reader, I’ve realized recently that our team adopted an accidental agreement we never actually discussed. Joe calls it: Slack Zero. Anybody who has ever been in a Zoom meeting with me and caught a glimpse of my inbox usually gasps. I am absolutely not an Inbox Zero person. But Slack? Completely different story. Without ever formally talking about it, our team collectively drifted toward a norm where Slack messages get answered almost immediately. This norm came from a good place – we all...